Species: Hasarius adansoni
Habitat: Hopping all over the tropics, including parts of north Africa, Europe, south Asia and Japan
Habitat: Hopping all over the tropics, including parts of north Africa, Europe, south Asia and Japan
For
most of us, blurry vision is a bad thing, if only because it means
we're going to have to spend a lot of money on a new pair of glasses.
For one jumping spider, though, it's how it catches dinner.
Adanson's
house jumper, as the name implies, is a jumping spider. It springs on
unsuspecting prey insects from several centimetres away and swiftly
dispatches them.
To
pull off these leaps, it has to be an excellent judge of distance. And
for that, paradoxically, it has part of its visual field permanently
out of focus. It's the only animal known to judge distance in this way.
Stalk, jump and bite
The Adanson's house jumper is a cosmopolitan species – meaning it lives all over the place. It hunts during the day, pouncing on insects and other prey, although like many jumping spiders it may also take the occasional drink of nectar.
To cope with its agile lifestyle, it must have excellent eyesight. How it works is not obvious, though. Lab tests have shown that it has top-class colour vision, but that doesn't help it judge distance.
Other animals have all sorts of ways to work out how far away an object is, the most obvious being simply to have two eyes with overlapping fields of vision and compare what they see.
There are also ways to judge distance using just one eye. Chameleons do it by changing the focus of the eye's lens, bringing the object in and out of focus. Alternatively, some insects move their heads from side to side to see how the object appears to move relative to the background.
According to Mitsumasa Koyanagi
of Osaka University in Japan and colleagues, though, the Adanson's
house jumper does it in a way that has been predicted from theory but
never seen in a real animal before.
I can see you…
The
spider has two pairs of forward-facing eyes: the central principal eyes
are flanked by anterior lateral eyes. If the latter pair are blinkered,
the spider can still judge distance, so the principal eyes must be able
to do it alone. The visual fields of these eyes don't overlap, though,
and they can't adjust their focus, so they can't be using any of the
known methods of judging distance.
Koyanagi found a clue in a 1981 study
of a related jumping spider, which like the Adanson's house jumper has
four layers of light-sensitive cells in its retinas. Bafflingly, the
second-deepest layer is full of receptors sensitive to green light, but
green light is always out of focus on that layer, so the image there
must be mostly blurred.
The
same is true of the Adanson's house jumper's principal eyes. That means
the blurry image on the second layer contrasts with the sharply focused
image on the layer below. As the spider closes in on its prey, the
defocused image will get blurrier still, allowing the spider to gauge
the distance.
Koyanagi
confirmed that this is how the spiders work by testing them under pure
green and pure red lights. Under red light, the total absence of green
should trick the spiders' perception of its defocused images, making
all objects seem closer than they are, so the spiders' jumps should
fall short. That was exactly what happened.
None like me
No
other known animal judges distance like this, but then, no other group
of animals has this retinal structure. All jumping spiders do, though,
and so Koyanagi says they may all share the rangefinding ability.
Humans
do something similar when we look at photos in which the subject is
sharply focused against a blurred background, but that only tells us
that the subject and background are at different distances: it doesn't
tell us how far we are from the subject. However, there are microscopes
that determine depth this way, and engineers working on computer vision
have long been interested in the idea.
The Adanson's house jumper, it seems, got there first.
Journal reference: Science, DOI: 10.1126/science.1211667
http://www.newscientist.com/
http://www.newscientist.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment