Beautiful, brainy boys (Image: Oxford Scientific/Getty)
Zoologger is our weekly column highlighting extraordinary animals – and occasionally other organisms – from around the world
Species: an isolated population of Gasterosteus aculeatus
Habitat: Lake Mývatn, Iceland
Habitat: Lake Mývatn, Iceland
In one of philosophy's greatest facepalm moments,
the normally quite intelligent Arthur Schopenhauer wrote that "women
are defective in the powers of reasoning and deliberation". If you find
it hard to believe that a well-educated and original thinker could hold
such a view, his essay Of Women leaves no doubt about it. Oddly enough, he never married.
However,
Schopenhauer might have had a point, if only he had been a three-spined
stickleback living in Lake Mývatn in Iceland. In this one population,
the males have brains much larger than those of the females. They are
the only species known where there is such a big disparity between the two sexes' brains.
What's surprising is that there aren't more animals like this. Species differ enormously in brain size, after all, and males and females often have different lifestyles that make different demands on their brains. Why do these few fish buck the trend?
Sticklers
Most three-spined sticklebacks live in the sea and only visit fresh water to breed, but others – like the Mývatn population – spend all their lives in fresh water. Behavioural scientists have studied them for decades because of their elaborate mating rituals.
At
the start of the breeding season, the males' skin turns a bright
orange-red, and their eyes go blue-green. Each male defends a patch of
territory, where he builds a nest from debris like pebbles and
vegetation. The males glue their building materials together with stuff called spiggin, which they make in their kidneys.
Once the nest is completed, the male installs himself in front of it and performs a zigzag dance to attract a female. When one approaches, the male leads her to the nest, and she takes a close look. If the nest is good, and the male a suitably bright red, she goes inside and lays her eggs, which the male promptly fertilises.
That
done, the female clears off and leaves the male in sole charge of the
eggs. They tend to get fungal infections, so he minimises the risk by
waving his fins to keep water moving through the nest, and if any eggs
become infected he picks them out.
Size isn't everything
Wondering if the male's complex lifestyles were reflected in their brains, Alexander Kotrschal
of Uppsala University in Sweden and colleagues dissected 58 males and
61 females, and weighed their brains. On average, both sexes were 4.5
centimetres long, but the males had brains weighing 24.2 milligrams,
whereas the females' weighed just 19.7 mg.
Kotrschal emphasises that the size of an animal's brain isn't everything.
"It's generally assumed that larger is better," he says, because having
more neurons for a given body mass should allow the brain to process
more information. However, there could also be unseen differences in
the numbers of connections between neurons. "The connectivity is also
extremely important."
He
hasn't put the males and females through intelligence tests to see
whether the size difference actually translates into ability. "It's
hard to infer cognitive abilities just from brain size," he says.
Nevertheless,
he points out that species with larger brains in proportion to body
size, like humans, do in general seem to be more intelligent than those
with smaller ones. So it's possible that the male sticklebacks really
are smarter than their females.
Why
would that be? It could be that the males have a more challenging
lifestyle: they have to build nests, perform courtship dances and then
care for the eggs. The females don't help with any of this – but they
do have to assess the males' dancing and nest-building, which takes
quite some powers of discernment.
It
could also be that the females devote a lot of energy to making eggs,
leaving little to run a large brain. The female's gonads can make up 40
per cent of her body mass, and so consume lots of nutrients.
There's a precedent for that sort of effect. Similar trade-offs are seen in male bats, some of which have shrunk their brains to get bigger testes. One can only imagine what Schopenhauer would have made of that.
Journal reference: PLoS One, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030055
http://www.newscientist.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment